The Tree(s) of Knowledge

Tomas might have succumbed in his quest for the Tree of Knowledge, but I finally found it, and am still alive :)

Theories can be crudely organized into a family tree where each might, at least in principle, be derivable from more fundamental ones above it.

The Tree of Knowledge

[courtesy- Max Tegmark]

And here is an awesome ‘learning map’ in Mathematics (rather big, click to view)

A Learning Map in Mathematics

Advertisement

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://satyavrat.wordpress.com/2007/10/21/the-trees-of-knowledge/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I meant that one can in principle derive Sociology from Psychology, as one can derive chemistry from quantum physics.
    Regarding postmodern suggestions- from whatever I know about them, they seem to me very confusing and inconsistent. I think their language will need to be much clearer to be taken with seriousness. In any case, this post is a quote of an interesting idea of Max Tegmark.

  2. What does ‘derive’ mean? In the sense that, does one ‘derive’, for instance, Chemistry from Atomic Physics, just as one can ‘derive’ Sociology from Psychology?

    Also, just curious, do you disregard the Postmodern suggestion that all Sciences are also fuctions of ethical positions that the Scientists take?

  3. hmm… interesting ))

  4. [...] いま数学のどこをやっているのか、という位置感覚が欲しかったので数学分野マップのようなものを探しましたが、英語のものしか見つかりませんでした。 辞書片手に解読する時間的余裕がないため、Wikipediaの数学項を参考にすることに。 北海道大学や東海大学のカリキュラムマップも理解の助けになりました。 Tags: log, math [...]

  5. Cool!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.